返回工作概览Back to selected work

04 / Personal AI System

个人 AI 系统Personal AI System

我正在把 AI 接入真实工作与生活,并持续验证它哪里有用、哪里不可靠、哪些适合自动化、哪些必须由人掌控。

I am bringing AI into real work and life while continuously testing where it helps, where it fails, what should be automated, and what must remain under human control.

  • 阶段Stage / 持续搭建与验证Building and testing
  • 范围Scope / Memory · Knowledge · Automation

不是工具清单,而是一套验证过程Not a tool list, but a validation process

这不是一份工具清单,也不被包装成已经成熟可靠的“个人操作系统”。它是一套持续运行的个人实验:把长期记忆、Obsidian 知识库、每日复盘、定时信息流和实战经验库接进日常,再把每次失败变成下一条可复用规则。

This is not a tool list or a claim of a finished, fully reliable “personal operating system.” It is an ongoing personal experiment: bringing long-term memory, Obsidian, daily reviews, scheduled information flows, and an experience library into real life, then turning each failure into a reusable rule.

  1. 发现真实问题Find a real problem从信息过载、上下文丢失、提醒失效或重复劳动中找到具体阻力。Identify concrete friction in information overload, lost context, failed reminders, or repeated work.
  2. 搭建并接入日常Build and use it daily让 Agent、知识库或自动化真正参与任务,而不是停留在演示。Put agents, knowledge, or automation into real tasks instead of leaving them as demos.
  3. 暴露不可靠Expose unreliability接受系统出现过期数据、重复投递、权限不可达和模型故障。Let stale data, duplicate delivery, permission gaps, and model failures become visible.
  4. 回到事实源Return to the source重新核验状态,修正判定规则,而不是接受一个听起来合理的答案。Recheck current state and fix the rule rather than accepting an answer that merely sounds plausible.
  5. 沉淀或关停Keep it or remove it有效经验进入知识库,失去价值的提醒和自动化被删除,重要控制权回到人手里。Useful lessons enter the knowledge base; low-value reminders and automations are removed, and important control returns to the human.

从问题到长期使用From problem to sustained use

我把信息过载、上下文丢失、提醒失效和重复劳动视为需要解决的问题,而不是先堆砌工具。通过长期记忆、知识库、复盘和按需自动化,让真实任务进入系统;每次异常后都回到事实源,修正规则。

I treat information overload, lost context, failed reminders, and repeated work as problems to solve—not reasons to accumulate more tools. Long-term memory, knowledge, reviews, and selective automation are used in real tasks; after each failure, I return to the source of truth and revise the rule.

这里不以功能数量或自动化数量作为结果,而以是否减少重复劳动、保留可追溯事实,并让重要决定仍由人掌控来评估。没有持续价值的流程会被关停。

Here I do not measure success by feature or automation count. I evaluate whether the system reduces repeated work, preserves traceable facts, and keeps consequential decisions under human control. Workflows without sustained value are shut down.

目前持续维护的四类能力Four capabilities under active development

  • 长期记忆Long-term memory用 Markdown 作为事实源,检索索引用于定位,避免让缓存替代真实记录。Markdown remains the source of truth, with search indexes used for retrieval rather than replacing the record.
  • 知识库Knowledge base使用 Obsidian 与 Agent 连接任务、项目、学习资料和可复用经验。Obsidian and agents connect tasks, projects, learning material, and reusable experience.
  • 复盘系统Review system要求复盘读取真实日程、任务和记录,压缩输出,只保留能改变下一步行动的结论。Reviews use real schedules, tasks, and records, then compress the output to conclusions that can change the next action.
  • 定时信息流Scheduled information源码更新、个性化摘要与记忆整理按需运行,无效或打扰过多的流程会被主动关停。Source updates, personalized summaries, and memory organization run when useful; noisy or low-value flows are deliberately shut down.

我保留的判断The judgment I keep

AI 应该降低认知负担,而不是制造更多需要维护的自动化。它可以承担检索、整理和重复执行,但事实核验、优先级和重要决策仍需要人负责。

AI should reduce cognitive load, not create more automation to maintain. It can retrieve, organize, and repeat, but factual validation, priorities, and consequential decisions still need human ownership.

继续了解Continue exploring

联系我Get in touch

明确机会、一个技术问题,或尚未成形的产品想法,都欢迎来聊。

Concrete opportunities, technical questions, and early product ideas are all welcome.